WebFeb 28, 2008 · Just recently, the President suggested the U.N. should vote for war or face irrelevance. The U.N. will not disappear just because most of its member countries disagree with George W. Bush. If debate and disagreement spelled the end of deliberative bodies, the U.S. Congress would have vanished long ago. WebNov 7, 2001 · WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush said Tuesday that there was no room for neutrality in the war against terrorism. In a joint news conference with French …
Bush:
WebJun 24, 2024 · Announcing the start of the "War on Terror" back then, President Bush declared that you were "either with us or against us". There was no middle ground, no … WebTo the U.S. elites, the American-imposed "universal laws and values" are non-negotiable, or in the words of former U.S. President George W. Bush, "you are either with us or against us" in a proclamation he made for … red school lane phillipsburg nj
Logical Fallacy Friday: The False Dilemma Shitty First Drafts
WebPresident George W. Bush: "You're either with us or against us." Either Or Choices Ex. They know that if we do not confront these evil men abroad, we will have to face them one day in our own cities and streets. Either continued war or unconditional surrender WebFeb 20, 2024 · The foreign ministers of the United States, Germany, and Ukraine have told the world “you can’t be neutral” in NATO’s proxy war with Russia, recalling President George W. Bush’s infamous declaration, “You are either with us, or against us”.. In doing so, these Western officials are implicitly criticizing the vast majority of the countries on Earth, … In political communication, the phrase "you are either with us, or against us" and similar variations are used to generate polarisation and reject non-partisanship. The implied consequence of not joining the partisan effort of the speaker is to be deemed an enemy. A contemporary example is the statement of former … See more The statement generally is a descriptive statement identifying the beliefs of the speakers, and thus state a basic assumption, not a logical conclusion. It may also be interpreted as a speech act. Sometimes it is … See more • Neutrality • Principle of bivalence • Thought-terminating cliché See more Historical quotations • From the Book of Joshua (Chap. 5:13): "It happened, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and behold, a man stood in front of him with his sword drawn in his hand. Joshua went to him, and said to … See more • Ajami, Fouad. "With Us or Against Us," New York Times Book Review 156.53817 (1/7/2007): 14–15. • Bethune, Brian. "Are You With Us or Against Us?" in Maclean's 119.45 (13 November 2006): 21. • "For us, or against us?" in Economist 376.8444 (17 September 2005): 44. See more red school logo